HarnessFix studies 30 agent repos and lifts task completion by up to 18.4 points

青稞AI · wechat · 2026-07-25

HarnessFix finds and repairs agent-harness flaws instead of blaming the model

A team from the Institute of Software, Chinese Academy of Sciences proposes HarnessFix, a framework for diagnosing and repairing flaws in the AgentHarness layer — the execution, tool, memory, orchestration, observability, verification, and governance stack around an LLM agent.

In evaluation on GAIA, SWE-Bench Verified, AppWorld, and Terminal-Bench 2.0 Verified, HarnessFix improves task completion rate by 6.3 to 18.4 points over the initial harness. Compared with the strongest automatic baseline, it still wins by 2.6 to 5.0 points, while using 63.5% to 100.5% fewer tokens offline.

The paper argues that many “model failures” are actually harness failures: missing parameter checks, swallowed errors, weak completion criteria, and poor observability. The key message is that agent reliability can often be improved by fixing the surrounding runtime, not just the prompt or the base model.

Original post →

More from coding & agent

coding & agent channel →