Stanford HAI warns that averaging expert safety scores can erase good chatbot advice
StanfordHAI · x · 2026-07-25
Stanford HAI says AI developers often rely on mental health experts to judge whether chatbot answers are safe — but averaging expert scores can produce advice nobody would actually call good.
- The problem is not just disagreement, but the way disagreement gets collapsed into one number.
- The post points to a failure mode in safety evaluation for mental-health-style chatbot responses.
- It suggests that naive aggregation can hide meaningful differences in expert judgment.
More from Research
- Mathematician Daniel Litt Launches Problem Repo to Track Human vs AI Progress: 15 Problems, 1 Solved — littmath · 2026-09-11
- Open ECDSA.fail challenge uses AI agents to shrink Shor's-algorithm quantum circuits for Bitcoin keys — StefanoGogioso · 2026-09-11
- Alex Townsend posts 200 open problems in numerical linear algebra for humans and AI agents — IgorCarron · 2026-09-11
- Navier-Stokes, Riemann, P vs NP: what this week's math buzzwords mean for you — koltregaskes · 2026-09-11
- Fruit fly brain as an LLM: connectome-driven language model demo goes live — ngxson · 2026-09-11
- Harry Collins: LLMs can't do frontier science because they can't invent new language — whoamisri · 2026-09-11