Metascience could reshape the scientific core, not replace it
anshulkundaje · x · 2026-07-24
Adam Marblestone says metascience innovations can be game-changing additions to America’s scientific core, but should not be seen as a replacement for it.
The framing is that new ways of doing science may materially improve the system, while still relying on the existing scientific institutions rather than trying to supplant them.
More from AGI Musings
- AI leaders should win by building better models, not by regulatory capture — DeryaTR_ · 2026-07-25
- Reddit asks where AI is surprisingly bad, not just impressive — PROfil_Official · 2026-07-25
- Frontier models can be superhuman on one task and fail hard on the next — nicolascraske · 2026-07-25
- Essay argues welfare states should not bet on OpenAI or Anthropic capturing all AI gains — paulnovosad · 2026-07-25
- Essay argues frontier AI needs moral character, not just rule-following ethics — theomitsa · 2026-07-25
- Forrester predicts a new AI ops layer called ContextOps for keeping context fresh — _N-iX_ · 2026-07-25