Terra beats Sonnet on lead classification and costs $1.22 vs. $4.03
samuelcolvin · x · 2026-07-24
A side-by-side report comparison says Terra beat Sonnet on the job that mattered most: classifying leads correctly.
What the comparison found
- Terra produced more accurate include/exclude decisions on entries that mattered for sales.
- It handled self-reported organizations more consistently.
- It avoided formatting leakage.
- Sonnet went deeper on rejected items, but it was weaker on correctly classifying the keepers.
The image also shows a sharp cost gap: the Terra report cost $1.22, while the Sonnet report cost $4.03.
Related event: Terra Outperforms Sonnet in Lead Classification at Lower Cost(3 posts)→
More from Models
- GPT-6.1 Terra spotted in the OpenAI API, teased by benchmark group LuminaBench — airesearch12 · 2026-10-27
- Ortet's first health eval: 34 open-weight models, 50 tasks, generic rankings fall short — thegautamkamath · 2026-10-27
- Fern 0.1: a 0.1–0.5T coding model one researcher pretrained in 3.5 months for under $10M — teortaxesTex · 2026-10-27
- VLM Run launches OCR Playground for side-by-side comparison of GLM-OCR, DeepSeek-OCR-2 and more — spillai · 2026-10-27
- GPT-6.1-Terra Live With Big Price Cut: $5 vs $12 Output Pricing — scaling01 · 2026-10-27
- Nat Lambert: traces from mid-tier open models are almost all super janky — natolambert · 2026-10-27