NeurIPS review batch is alleged to contain 60% ChatGPT-written reviews and 20% AI-written papers
nanjiang_cs · x · 2026-07-24
A thread says NeurIPS appears to have a large share of ChatGPT-generated reviews and even some ChatGPT-generated papers in one batch, raising the question of whether human-written reviews and meta-reviews are still worth the effort.
- One user claims that in a batch of 30 submissions, roughly 60% of reviews looked ChatGPT-generated.
- The same batch allegedly had about 20% ChatGPT-generated papers.
- The post frames this as a broader integrity problem for academic reviewing, not just a one-off complaint.
Related event: NeurIPS Reviews and Submissions Flagged as AI-Generated(2 posts)→
More from Research
- Fast ViT shows strong ImageNet results; scaling runs needed next — ducha_aiki · 2026-09-11
- Loss Functions Are Scientific Assumptions: MSE Implies Gaussian Noise, Cross-Entropy Implies Bernoulli — bravo_abad · 2026-09-11
- SymKit MCP: 44 tools for AI agents to verify symbolic derivations — Foreign-Specific-604 · 2026-09-11
- Researchers: LLMs under pressure invent new languages unreadable to humans — mikeflache · 2026-09-11
- Mi-Ripple fixes ripple artifacts left by iterative AI image editing — Miyang-AI · 2026-09-11
- DRG-MAPPO uses dynamic role graphs to boost multi-agent air combat win rates — China666 · 2026-09-11