NeurIPS review batch is alleged to contain 60% ChatGPT-written reviews and 20% AI-written papers
nanjiang_cs · x · 2026-07-24
A thread says NeurIPS appears to have a large share of ChatGPT-generated reviews and even some ChatGPT-generated papers in one batch, raising the question of whether human-written reviews and meta-reviews are still worth the effort.
- One user claims that in a batch of 30 submissions, roughly 60% of reviews looked ChatGPT-generated.
- The same batch allegedly had about 20% ChatGPT-generated papers.
- The post frames this as a broader integrity problem for academic reviewing, not just a one-off complaint.
Related event: NeurIPS Reviews and Submissions Flagged as AI-Generated(2 posts)→
More from Research
- Researchers identify "Forking": train loss falls while validation loss turns up — ZimingLiu11 · 2026-10-26
- Google DeepMind pilots world's first double-blind evaluations for frontier models — scychan_brains · 2026-10-26
- Rewriting scaling law study: optimal synthetic data share rises from 10% to 32% with compute — heghbalz · 2026-10-26
- FLASH: GPU-native deformable sim learns cloth folding in minutes on one RTX 5090 — ChongZzZhang · 2026-10-26
- LEMON: zero-shot LLM misbehavior monitor flags hallucinations from attention maps — yoavartzi · 2026-10-26
- Behind the EMNLP keynote: LMs as simulated learners to generate child language acquisition hypotheses — najoungkim · 2026-10-26