AI conferences are debating whether metareviews should come before rebuttals
xwang_lk · x · 2026-07-24
Researchers are debating a review-process change at an AI conference: metareviews are being handled differently than in HCI venues, where they usually appear before rebuttals to guide what authors should emphasize.
The reply argues that in AI conferences this is being done for the first time, and that the HCI approach would make more sense because metareviews are meant to shape rebuttals, not follow them.
Related event: NeurIPS Review Sequence Sparks Meta-Review Debate(4 posts)→
More from Research
- GameWorld wins Best Paper Runner-Up at ECCV 2026 Multimodal Digital Agents Workshop — MikeShou1 · 2026-09-11
- 3D ResNet Paper Crosses 3,000 Citations Eight Years After CVPR 2018 — HirokatuKataoka · 2026-09-11
- Sample selection and ordering matter a lot in LLM training: DataFlex makes data scheduling dynamic — Puzzleheaded_Box2842 · 2026-09-11
- Jeff Heaton's Intro to the Math of Neural Networks eBook Is Free to Download — blaizedsouza · 2026-09-11
- Mathematician Daniel Litt Launches Problem Repo to Track Human vs AI Progress: 15 Problems, 1 Solved — littmath · 2026-09-11
- Open ECDSA.fail challenge uses AI agents to shrink Shor's-algorithm quantum circuits for Bitcoin keys — StefanoGogioso · 2026-09-11