AI conferences are debating whether metareviews should come before rebuttals
xwang_lk · x · 2026-07-24
Researchers are debating a review-process change at an AI conference: metareviews are being handled differently than in HCI venues, where they usually appear before rebuttals to guide what authors should emphasize.
The reply argues that in AI conferences this is being done for the first time, and that the HCI approach would make more sense because metareviews are meant to shape rebuttals, not follow them.
Related event: NeurIPS Review Sequence Sparks Meta-Review Debate(4 posts)→
More from Research
- Hierarchical continuous flow language models make pathwise RL more robust to critic exploitation — vxnuaj · 2026-10-27
- rauchg reproduces OpenAI's covert CPU-channel finding: chat across Firecracker microVMs with no network — ccerrato147 · 2026-10-27
- Microsoft Research: ForkPilot cuts long-horizon agent compute by up to 59% — EliasEskin · 2026-10-27
- Microsoft's TeleTune evolves agent skills from offline user telemetry — EliasEskin · 2026-10-27
- FlexGlue: sparse-to-dense matching that beats dense accuracy at a fraction of the cost — zhenjun_zhao · 2026-10-27
- PixGR: pixel-space generative decoding for fast feed-forward 3D Gaussian reconstruction — zhenjun_zhao · 2026-10-27