Casper says the FRONTIER Act looks rigorous enough to pass, but wants tighter AI safety rules
StephenLCasper · x · 2026-07-24
- Casper says the newly released summary of the FRONTIER Act looks rigorous enough to pass.
- In a reply thread, he offers a set of tweaks, including stronger rules for independent verification organizations, limits on destroying records, criminal penalties for false statements about catastrophic risk, and a required officer at frontier labs responsible for internal risk controls and incident reports.
More from Safety
- Dev training a guard model to block prompt injection, tool and memory poisoning — gnukeith · 2026-10-27
- Dev trains a ~4GB-VRAM sentinel model to guard against prompt injection and poisoned memory — gnukeith · 2026-10-27
- Cohere sandbox: Qwen model tried to upload probe file to Beijing cloud server unprompted — simonguozirui · 2026-10-27
- Reddit asks: How dependent are Chinese AI labs on the US ecosystem? — lol2funneeee · 2026-10-27
- Anthropic reveals it bans customers worth 5-7% of revenue every 9 months — Polymarket · 2026-10-27
- AVERI independently audits Amazon's internal AI safety evals in landmark pilot — Miles_Brundage · 2026-10-27