Casper says the FRONTIER Act looks rigorous enough to pass, but wants tighter AI safety rules
StephenLCasper · x · 2026-07-24
- Casper says the newly released summary of the FRONTIER Act looks rigorous enough to pass.
- In a reply thread, he offers a set of tweaks, including stronger rules for independent verification organizations, limits on destroying records, criminal penalties for false statements about catastrophic risk, and a required officer at frontier labs responsible for internal risk controls and incident reports.
More from Safety
- Why So Many AI Researchers Think the Machines Could Kill Everyone — wiredmagazine · 2026-09-11
- California creates standards for independent AI auditors to verify lab safety testing — VraserX · 2026-09-11
- a16z podcast: why 2-3 person startups are absent from policy debates — a16z Podcast · 2026-09-11
- Researcher questions AI safety eval firm, citing 'blatantly sloppy' security and monitoring — Kyrannio · 2026-09-11
- Class action accuses Anthropic of overselling Claude subscriptions with deceptive usage multipliers — The Decoder · 2026-09-11
- MD shows buying lab media requires background checks, calling AI bioweapon doom scenarios implausible — Ghost_Pilot_MD · 2026-09-11