NeurIPS author says this year’s reviews were notably more helpful
chhaviyadav_ · x · 2026-07-24
A NeurIPS author says this year’s reviews for their papers were unusually helpful.
- They report the reviews were not sloppy and did not fixate on irrelevant details.
- The post expresses optimism about the future of peer review and conferences.
- It’s framed as a small but encouraging sign that review quality may be improving.
Related event: NeurIPS Authors Find This Year's Reviews Surprisingly Helpful(2 posts)→
More from Companies & People
- Cohere Labs hosts a park meetup on linear attention papers this Saturday — Cohere_Labs · 2026-07-24
- Ex-Facebook Engineering Lead: Splitting Teams by Tool Was a Huge Mistake — cnakazawa · 2026-07-24
- DeepSeek founder Liang Wenfeng says CUDA’s moat is weakening and Ascend may emerge as an alternative — sudoraohacker · 2026-07-24
- Lily Ray says GEO hype is noisy and experienced SEOs still matter — gaganghotra_ · 2026-07-24
- Boson AI is Hiring Pretraining and Post-Training Talent Amidst Amazon AGI Layoffs — smolix · 2026-07-24
- Vercel AI Hiring Engineering Managers for Agents and CLI Frameworks — threepointone · 2026-07-24