User says Opus 5 limits are so bad they’d pay 3x more to switch to Chinese models
MarcJSchmidt · x · 2026-07-24
The poster says that if Opus 5 keeps the same arbitrary session limits and restrictions, they will switch to Chinese models even at 3x the cost.
The complaint is not about raw capability, but about product policy: session caps and abrupt stopping of work are framed as an unacceptable business strategy. The writer adds that even OpenAI is starting to feel friendlier by comparison, which underlines how much model UX and usage limits shape loyalty.
More from Models
- xAI rolls out Grok 4.5 across X, web, iOS, and Android — XFreeze · 2026-07-24
- Users say Opus 5 is redirecting chats to Opus 4.8 and denying it exists — haider1 · 2026-07-24
- Claude Opus 5 gets delayed to tomorrow, and the feed makes a joke of it — gaganghotra_ · 2026-07-24
- Kimi K3 scores 32% on ExploitBench and reaches 0 of 41 ACE cases — xeophon · 2026-07-24
- Rumor: OpenAI's Unnamed Internal Model Beats GPT-6 Across the Board — imjustnewatai · 2026-07-24
- Epoch AI will benchmark GPT 5.6 Sol live on Slay the Spire with commentary — Jsevillamol · 2026-07-24