A new essay says AI’s weak labor impact is about how LLMs really work
round · x · 2026-07-24
A quoted essay argues that the weak labor-market impact of AI is not best explained by a temporary lag or by vague AGI talk.
- The author says people are still failing to analyze LLMs as LLMs.
- The attached excerpt argues that large language models do not fit neatly into human-style error-catching systems.
- It also notes that nearly four years after ChatGPT, unemployment has barely budged, and some recent job-market turbulence may have causes other than AI.
More from AGI Musings
- Instinct launches agent-to-agent protocol to coordinate your plans, sparking 'friction is the point' backlash — itsOmSarraf_ · 2026-09-11
- We are witnessing the unreasonable effectiveness of inference-time scaling — sqcai · 2026-09-11
- Accelerationist fires back at AI doomers: beliefs aren't arguments — Dan_Jeffries1 · 2026-09-11
- "ChatGPT 6 Makes Workers with IQ Below 130 Useless": French AI Debate Sparks Backlash — mitchdeg · 2026-09-11
- 'AGI is here' vs reality: AI labs still ship some of the jankiest desktop apps ever — MilesCranmer · 2026-09-11
- Harry Collins: LLMs can't do frontier science because they can't invent new language — whoamisri · 2026-09-11