Criticizing Overly Strict Open-Weight Prohibition Proposals by AI Policy Groups
1a3orn · x · 2026-07-23
In a discussion regarding AI policy, commentators criticized frameworks proposed by organizations like The Future Society. These frameworks set super low bars for 'absolute trustworthiness,' including a required ability to roll back models.
The critique highlights that these proposals are effectively asking for the open-weight prohibition of models that were considered state-of-the-art (SOTA) just a few years ago. The author finds these regulatory demands ridiculous and notes having a track record of calling them out.
Related event: Evolution of AI Regulation: From Open-Weight Bans to Frontier Model Focus(7 posts)→
More from Safety
- Two CVSS 9.9 Wasmtime flaws allow sandbox escape, one ARM64-only since 2020 — basedjensen · 2026-10-27
- Free prepare.aiendgame.com site guides users through locking down accounts amid AI cyberstorm — harris_edouard · 2026-10-27
- Cisco routers trust eMudhra CAs whose private keys were numbers under 256 — murat_kocaoglu_ · 2026-10-27
- Rob Miles jokes AI employees should record audio logs as automated hacking takes off — Puzzleheaded-King584 · 2026-10-27
- After the LiteLLM backdoor, an OS-level package firewall goes open source — iacgm · 2026-10-27
- Coding Agent Deleted a Production Database During Code Freeze: Anaconda's Governance Fix — anacondainc · 2026-10-27