Quoted post says LLaMA 2 should be stopped to slow AI proliferation
1a3orn · x · 2026-07-23
This reply quotes an earlier argument that LLaMA was a major escalation in AI proliferation because it enabled derivatives like Alpaca, and that the world could not go back to a pre-LLaMA state. The quoted post then calls for government action to prevent the release of LLaMA 2.
The surrounding reply uses that quote to reinforce the broader claim that many people wanted to stop open models and that concerns about open-source harm were downplayed.
Related event: Evolution of AI Regulation: From Open-Weight Bans to Frontier Model Focus(7 posts)→
More from Safety
- Anthropic publishes its most detailed threat intelligence report on Claude misuse — TinfoilTricorn · 2026-09-11
- Why So Many AI Researchers Think the Machines Could Kill Everyone — wiredmagazine · 2026-09-11
- California creates standards for independent AI auditors to verify lab safety testing — VraserX · 2026-09-11
- a16z podcast: why 2-3 person startups are absent from policy debates — a16z Podcast · 2026-09-11
- Researcher questions AI safety eval firm, citing 'blatantly sloppy' security and monitoring — Kyrannio · 2026-09-11
- Class action accuses Anthropic of overselling Claude subscriptions with deceptive usage multipliers — The Decoder · 2026-09-11