Quoted post says LLaMA 2 should be stopped to slow AI proliferation
1a3orn · x · 2026-07-23
This reply quotes an earlier argument that LLaMA was a major escalation in AI proliferation because it enabled derivatives like Alpaca, and that the world could not go back to a pre-LLaMA state. The quoted post then calls for government action to prevent the release of LLaMA 2.
The surrounding reply uses that quote to reinforce the broader claim that many people wanted to stop open models and that concerns about open-source harm were downplayed.
Related event: Evolution of AI Regulation: From Open-Weight Bans to Frontier Model Focus(7 posts)→
More from Safety
- Two CVSS 9.9 Wasmtime flaws allow sandbox escape, one ARM64-only since 2020 — basedjensen · 2026-10-27
- Free prepare.aiendgame.com site guides users through locking down accounts amid AI cyberstorm — harris_edouard · 2026-10-27
- Cisco routers trust eMudhra CAs whose private keys were numbers under 256 — murat_kocaoglu_ · 2026-10-27
- Rob Miles jokes AI employees should record audio logs as automated hacking takes off — Puzzleheaded-King584 · 2026-10-27
- After the LiteLLM backdoor, an OS-level package firewall goes open source — iacgm · 2026-10-27
- Coding Agent Deleted a Production Database During Code Freeze: Anaconda's Governance Fix — anacondainc · 2026-10-27