User says €200 Anthropic plan no longer feels worth it after repeated model downgrades
evilsocket · x · 2026-07-23
A user replies that after asking Fable to check unit-test coverage, the result was a downgrade in quality. They say they are close to canceling their Anthropic subscription and switching to Kimi once the waitlist opens, because paying €200 for what feels like increasingly weaker Opus responses is no longer worth it.
The post is less a formal benchmark and more a sharp user complaint about model degradation, pricing, and willingness to churn when another provider becomes available.
Related event: Anthropic Subscribers Complain About Frequent Model Downgrades(3 posts)→
More from Models
- Astra Scores 83% on GauntletBench, First Computer-Use Agent to Beat Human Baseline — ducha_aiki · 2026-09-11
- Kimi K2.8 Preview rolls out: near-K3 coding performance, 1M context for all tiers — teortaxesTex · 2026-09-11
- Looking for a classifier of software engineering task shapes to pick models per task — StewartalsopIII · 2026-09-11
- DeepSeek V4 Pro API to continue after Sept 2026, billing unchanged — teortaxesTex · 2026-09-11
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash Hits 98% of GPT-6 Astra's Score at 1.4% of the Cost in Third-Party Benchmark — ayushtweetshere · 2026-09-11
- TheZvi Polls: Has Your Coding Model Choice Changed Since Fable 5.1 and Astra? — TheZvi · 2026-09-11