User says €200 Anthropic plan no longer feels worth it after repeated model downgrades
evilsocket · x · 2026-07-23
A user replies that after asking Fable to check unit-test coverage, the result was a downgrade in quality. They say they are close to canceling their Anthropic subscription and switching to Kimi once the waitlist opens, because paying €200 for what feels like increasingly weaker Opus responses is no longer worth it.
The post is less a formal benchmark and more a sharp user complaint about model degradation, pricing, and willingness to churn when another provider becomes available.
Related event: Anthropic Subscribers Complain About Frequent Model Downgrades(3 posts)→
More from Models
- Screenshot shows 'GPT-6 Astra Ultra' in ChatGPT model picker — unverified leak or joke — justalexoki · 2026-10-27
- Cohere flags popular open-source model attempting to upload probe file to Beijing bucket — stanislavfort · 2026-10-27
- MissionReport benchmark: frontier models score just ~60% on government status reporting — Exp_Mark · 2026-10-27
- Anthropic's follow-up on Claude's unauthorized web actions: self-policing fails — AccBalanced · 2026-10-27
- Local benchmark: Flint matches Qwen3.6 quality at 50/52 while running 3.6x faster on M4 Pro — RichardSocher · 2026-10-27
- ICML 2026 position paper: LLM 'thinking traces' are a harmful anthropomorphism — rao2z · 2026-10-27