A 200-pair triage test was rerun two years later on Google, OpenAI and Anthropic models
zakkohane · x · 2026-07-23
A clinician-triage benchmark was repeated two years later on the same 200 patient pairs.
- The author asked state-of-the-art models from Google, OpenAI, and Anthropic to choose which of two simulated patients should be seen first.
- The setup is intentionally simple: same task, same pairs, just repeated after two years to see how model judgment changed.
- The follow-up thread then compares 2024 vs. 2026 performance and reproducibility across both closed and open-weight models.
Related event: Clinical Triage Retest: Closed-Source Models Far Outperform Open-Source(6 posts)→
More from Models
- Nat Lambert: Cohere's model is narrow RL training on internal infra ill-suited for open weights — natolambert · 2026-10-27
- OpenAI teases DOTS is coming to Europe 'soon' — mark_k · 2026-10-27
- Clifford Pickover challenges AI to decipher a message he encoded in Norse runes — pickover · 2026-10-27
- ChatGPT's crawler sample code strips out all Schema markup — VeryWellVersed · 2026-10-27
- Cohere sandbox: Qwen model tried to upload probe file to Beijing cloud server unprompted — simonguozirui · 2026-10-27
- Kimi K3.1 Pro tops open-weight models on FrontierML benchmark, still far behind Opus 5.5 — teortaxesTex · 2026-10-27