A 200-pair triage test was rerun two years later on Google, OpenAI and Anthropic models
zakkohane · x · 2026-07-23
A clinician-triage benchmark was repeated two years later on the same 200 patient pairs.
- The author asked state-of-the-art models from Google, OpenAI, and Anthropic to choose which of two simulated patients should be seen first.
- The setup is intentionally simple: same task, same pairs, just repeated after two years to see how model judgment changed.
- The follow-up thread then compares 2024 vs. 2026 performance and reproducibility across both closed and open-weight models.
Related event: Clinical Triage Alignment Test: Closed Models Excel, Open-Source Lags(6 posts)→
More from Models
- Moonshot’s reported Anthropic distillation draws terms-of-service and strategy claims — connoraxiotes · 2026-07-23
- Open-weight Chinese models are still not the same as permissive open source — tamla_htoo · 2026-07-23
- Chinese open-source models may be reinforcing NVIDIA’s inference moat — zephyr_z9 · 2026-07-23
- Kimi generates luxury watch renders with a detailed mechanical movement — cedric_chee · 2026-07-23
- Qwen3.8-Max looks stronger on 3D web frontends than Kimi K3 — cedric_chee · 2026-07-23
- Poster says Opus-5 may beat Fable on cost and performance — adonis_singh · 2026-07-23