A 200-pair triage test was rerun two years later on Google, OpenAI and Anthropic models
zakkohane · x · 2026-07-23
A clinician-triage benchmark was repeated two years later on the same 200 patient pairs.
- The author asked state-of-the-art models from Google, OpenAI, and Anthropic to choose which of two simulated patients should be seen first.
- The setup is intentionally simple: same task, same pairs, just repeated after two years to see how model judgment changed.
- The follow-up thread then compares 2024 vs. 2026 performance and reproducibility across both closed and open-weight models.
Related event: Clinical Triage Retest: Closed-Source Models Far Outperform Open-Source(6 posts)→
More from Models
- Astra Scores 83% on GauntletBench, First Computer-Use Agent to Beat Human Baseline — ducha_aiki · 2026-09-11
- Kimi K2.8 Preview rolls out: near-K3 coding performance, 1M context for all tiers — teortaxesTex · 2026-09-11
- Looking for a classifier of software engineering task shapes to pick models per task — StewartalsopIII · 2026-09-11
- DeepSeek V4 Pro API to continue after Sept 2026, billing unchanged — teortaxesTex · 2026-09-11
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash Hits 98% of GPT-6 Astra's Score at 1.4% of the Cost in Third-Party Benchmark — ayushtweetshere · 2026-09-11
- TheZvi Polls: Has Your Coding Model Choice Changed Since Fable 5.1 and Astra? — TheZvi · 2026-09-11