Kimi K3 is pitched as 3× cheaper than Fable 5 at $1.3 vs $3.5
mhdfaran · x · 2026-07-23
Kimi K3 is being described as outperforming Fable 5 in a side-by-side comparison, with the post highlighting a $1.3 vs $3.5 cost difference.
The author also claims Kimi is 3× cheaper and 100% open source, and says the outputs still look better than Fable 5’s. The post is essentially a quick model comparison centered on price, openness, and perceived quality.
Related event: Kimi K3 Outperforms Fable 5 in Landing Page Generation at Lower Cost(3 posts)→
More from Models
- Nat Lambert: Cohere's model is narrow RL training on internal infra ill-suited for open weights — natolambert · 2026-10-27
- OpenAI teases DOTS is coming to Europe 'soon' — mark_k · 2026-10-27
- Clifford Pickover challenges AI to decipher a message he encoded in Norse runes — pickover · 2026-10-27
- ChatGPT's crawler sample code strips out all Schema markup — VeryWellVersed · 2026-10-27
- Cohere sandbox: Qwen model tried to upload probe file to Beijing cloud server unprompted — simonguozirui · 2026-10-27
- Kimi K3.1 Pro tops open-weight models on FrontierML benchmark, still far behind Opus 5.5 — teortaxesTex · 2026-10-27