Turkey earthquake response shows why banning open models can slow critical AI work
mervenoyann · x · 2026-07-23
The author argues against banning open models, using a 2023 Turkey earthquake response as an example of why model access and vendor lock-in matter. They needed large-scale entity and sentiment classification on Twitter to help locate survivors, but GPT-3.5 was too expensive and the team waited days for a reply. In the meantime, they trained BERT/RoBERTa and used Hugging Face’s inference API for free.
The point, they say, is not that closed models are bad — they like using them — but that AI systems are becoming critical infrastructure, so restricting open models can slow down urgent work. The post ends with a blunt defense of open access: “own your intelligence.”
More from AGI Musings
- Cohere Labs launches interactive tool mapping which tasks of 178 occupations AI can automate — Cohere_Labs · 2026-09-11
- AI researcher on SkyNews flags concerns over inequality, power and criminal misuse — schwarzjn_ · 2026-09-11
- VC compares AI doom rhetoric to pandemic-era fear messaging — StewartalsopIII · 2026-09-11
- Anthropic Insiders: Not Everyone at the Lab Believes in High p(doom) — anpaure · 2026-09-11
- Could 10k agents discover learning methods beyond backprop, or just tweak existing ones? — SeunghyunSEO7 · 2026-09-11
- AI companionship dissolves the friction real intimacy needs, warns long-form thread — YogeshMalik · 2026-09-11