Turkey earthquake response shows why banning open models can slow critical AI work
mervenoyann · x · 2026-07-23
The author argues against banning open models, using a 2023 Turkey earthquake response as an example of why model access and vendor lock-in matter. They needed large-scale entity and sentiment classification on Twitter to help locate survivors, but GPT-3.5 was too expensive and the team waited days for a reply. In the meantime, they trained BERT/RoBERTa and used Hugging Face’s inference API for free.
The point, they say, is not that closed models are bad — they like using them — but that AI systems are becoming critical infrastructure, so restricting open models can slow down urgent work. The post ends with a blunt defense of open access: “own your intelligence.”
More from AGI Musings
- Ben Goertzel asks what a modern AGI curriculum should look like — bengoertzel · 2026-07-23
- David Patterson says superintelligence will feel like talking to God, soon — davidpattersonx · 2026-07-23
- Nathan Benaich says AI will design nearly every molecule soon — nathanbenaich · 2026-07-23
- AI race could outmaneuver national security institutions, columnist warns — S_OhEigeartaigh · 2026-07-23
- “Argument ad machinam” lands as a tiny AI-era meme — francoisfleuret · 2026-07-23
- Europe’s AI scene is “barely even playing,” says one blunt industry rant — MarvinTBaumann · 2026-07-23