Dean Ball says Kimi is strong at coding, but open-weight economics still hurt
koltregaskes · x · 2026-07-23
This post summarizes and reacts to Dean Ball’s argument about Moonshot’s Kimi and the economics of open-weight models.
Key points:
- Kimi is described as strong in agentic coding, roughly in the class of the best Q1 2026 models, but it may be more token-hungry than expected, reducing its cost advantage.
- On why Chinese labs keep shipping capable open-weight models, the take is split roughly 75% strategic blindness to AGI risk and 25% practical necessity.
- The argument is that Chinese labs struggle to compete in paid services, and users outside China generally would not pay for their models anyway, so open-weight releases are partly ideology and partly business reality.
- The broader thesis: if users move to free models instead of paying frontier labs, the economics of the frontier model market get harder.
More from AGI Musings
- AI Safety Researcher Warns Current Crisis Could Lead to Loss of Control, Proposes 3 Fixes — LuizaJarovsky · 2026-10-26
- Ben Thompson's 'The End of the Internet': when creation goes free, winners go small — tushaarmehtaa · 2026-10-26
- Revolut CEO: China's 9/9/6 work culture makes it unbeatable — only 2 of 140 startups survived — davidsenra · 2026-10-26
- AI Is Redistributing Technical Power Inside Companies, Not Just Creating New Roles — mdancho84 · 2026-10-26
- Two New Papers Quantify AI's Impact on India's Labour Market With PLFS Data — ravi_iitm · 2026-10-26
- AI thinking is to human thought what planes are to bird flight — js_craft_hq · 2026-10-26