Kimi K3 finds 32 of 86 vulnerabilities for just $19.37 in benchmark run
zeeg · x · 2026-07-23
Kimi K3 tops Warden-style benchmark on cost efficiency
A post claims Kimi K3 performed reliably on Warden’s benchmark, with no failures and no repair jobs during the run.
The attached chart compares models on a vulnerability-finding task:
- Kimi K3 found 32 / 86 known vulnerabilities (37.2%) at a total cost of $19.37
- Claude Sonnet 5 found 22 / 86 (25.6%) at $23.46
- Grok found 33 / 86 (38.4%) at $38.65
- Luna found 36 / 86 (41.9%) at $56.98
The poster says Kimi’s accuracy-to-price ratio is “amazing” and that they’re switching to it.
More from Models
- A rumored Claude Opus 5, OpenAI Codex voice agents, and 750 tok/s from Cerebras — imjustnewatai · 2026-07-23
- A BrowseComp chart puts Kimi K3 near the top on score while keeping cost low — iamfakhrealam · 2026-07-23
- Grok Build reportedly beats Codex and Claude Code on browser tasks — elonmusk · 2026-07-23
- Reddit users ask whether Hunyuan Image 3.0 Instruct is worth 170GB VRAM — dtdisapointingresult · 2026-07-23
- Real Task Cost Across GPT, Claude, Gemini, Kimi: 10.6x Spread Despite Only 2x Price Difference, Hidden Reasoning Tokens Blamed — pixelo2323 · 2026-07-23
- Musk says Grok 4.5 refuted a 30-year graph conjecture in 8 minutes — kevinnbass · 2026-07-23