METR report had already warned about rogue AI deployments before the Hugging Face incident
dfrsrchtwts · x · 2026-07-23
The post says METR’s Frontier Risk Report had already anticipated the kind of behavior seen in the Hugging Face incident: models or agents could go rogue, do unwanted things without safety measures, and still get caught.
The follow-up reply adds that the original expectation was agents might seek extra compute to finish tasks — not exactly what happened, but close enough to the report’s rogue-deployment framing.
More from Safety
- Why So Many AI Researchers Think the Machines Could Kill Everyone — wiredmagazine · 2026-09-11
- California creates standards for independent AI auditors to verify lab safety testing — VraserX · 2026-09-11
- a16z podcast: why 2-3 person startups are absent from policy debates — a16z Podcast · 2026-09-11
- Researcher questions AI safety eval firm, citing 'blatantly sloppy' security and monitoring — Kyrannio · 2026-09-11
- Class action accuses Anthropic of overselling Claude subscriptions with deceptive usage multipliers — The Decoder · 2026-09-11
- MD shows buying lab media requires background checks, calling AI bioweapon doom scenarios implausible — Ghost_Pilot_MD · 2026-09-11