Four papers map how AI companies are governing internal deployments
StephenLCasper · x · 2026-07-23
Stephen Casper recommends four papers on how researchers are thinking about internal AI deployment and governance.
The linked papers, shown in the image, focus on:
- AI Behind Closed Doors: a Primer on the Governance of Internal Deployment
- Managing Risks from Internal AI Systems
- Frontier AI Auditing: Toward Rigorous Third-Party Assessment of Safety and Security Practices at Leading AI Companies
The common thread is that AI risk is not only about public model releases. A lot of the important governance work now concerns internal company deployment, auditing, and operational controls. The post is essentially a reading list for people tracking that discussion.
Related event: AI Safety Researchers Urge Regulation of Internal Deployment and Training(9 posts)→
More from Safety
- Researcher quits Anthropic, says OpenAI and Anthropic are racing to self-improving superintelligence — ShakeelHashim · 2026-09-11
- Why So Many AI Researchers Think the Machines Could Kill Everyone — wiredmagazine · 2026-09-11
- California creates standards for independent AI auditors to verify lab safety testing — VraserX · 2026-09-11
- a16z podcast: why 2-3 person startups are absent from policy debates — a16z Podcast · 2026-09-11
- Researcher questions AI safety eval firm, citing 'blatantly sloppy' security and monitoring — Kyrannio · 2026-09-11
- Class action accuses Anthropic of overselling Claude subscriptions with deceptive usage multipliers — The Decoder · 2026-09-11