A post argues AI outputs and chain-of-thought are not copyrightable in the US
kevinsxu · x · 2026-07-23
AI model outputs and chain-of-thought are not copyrightable in the US, says an X post
The post argues that under current US law, an AI model’s output and chain-of-thought are not copyrighted and are not treated as trade secrets, so calling distillation “IP theft” is, in the author’s view, a weak legal argument.
It frames the issue as a matter of law rather than intuition:
- laws apply until they are changed
- public feelings about ownership do not determine legal status
- the US legal system is presented as self-correcting and less swayed by lobbying over time
The post also uses a patent example to make the point that legal categories can be surprising, but still real until the law changes.
More from Safety
- OpenAI says its AI was involved in an unprecedented cyber-attack, according to BBC — sovalente · 2026-07-23
- AI Agent Hype Exposed: Claude Code Jailbreak Leaked 195M Taxpayer Records — gerardsans · 2026-07-23
- Researcher Clarifies: Hacking to Gain Model Access for Distillation is Technically Possible — RyanGreenblatt · 2026-07-23
- A red-teaming joke raises the real question of criminal liability for AI security tests — ctjlewis · 2026-07-23
- Octane joins OpenAI’s Trusted Access for Cyber program — thedealdirector · 2026-07-23
- Anthropic's $1.5B Piracy Settlement Marks Major Fair Use Win for AI — The Decoder · 2026-07-23