A post argues AI outputs and chain-of-thought are not copyrightable in the US
kevinsxu · x · 2026-07-23
AI model outputs and chain-of-thought are not copyrightable in the US, says an X post
The post argues that under current US law, an AI model’s output and chain-of-thought are not copyrighted and are not treated as trade secrets, so calling distillation “IP theft” is, in the author’s view, a weak legal argument.
It frames the issue as a matter of law rather than intuition:
- laws apply until they are changed
- public feelings about ownership do not determine legal status
- the US legal system is presented as self-correcting and less swayed by lobbying over time
The post also uses a patent example to make the point that legal categories can be surprising, but still real until the law changes.
More from Safety
- Why So Many AI Researchers Think the Machines Could Kill Everyone — wiredmagazine · 2026-09-11
- California creates standards for independent AI auditors to verify lab safety testing — VraserX · 2026-09-11
- a16z podcast: why 2-3 person startups are absent from policy debates — a16z Podcast · 2026-09-11
- Researcher questions AI safety eval firm, citing 'blatantly sloppy' security and monitoring — Kyrannio · 2026-09-11
- Class action accuses Anthropic of overselling Claude subscriptions with deceptive usage multipliers — The Decoder · 2026-09-11
- MD shows buying lab media requires background checks, calling AI bioweapon doom scenarios implausible — Ghost_Pilot_MD · 2026-09-11