Token speed fails to predict real task time or cost, a 13-model probe finds
According-Floor5177 · reddit · 2026-07-23
A Reddit user argues that tokens per second is a poor proxy for how fast or cheaply a model finishes a real task.
- In one probe across 13 models, KAT-Coder was third in token output speed but finished tenth because it spent 5,536 tokens, while GPT-5.5 used only 1,777.
- The same probe found provider variance: Kimi K2.7 ranged from 223 tok/s on Together to 28 tok/s on DeepInfra, and GLM-5.2 landed on six different providers in six runs.
- The takeaway is that wall-clock time and end-to-end cost matter more than raw generation speed, and provider routing can materially change results.
More from Infra
- SF Compute founder: buying compute is 'an absolutely awful experience' right now — IgorCarron · 2026-09-11
- SmolVM open-sources persistent computer infrastructure for agents that outlive chat sessions — aniketmaurya · 2026-09-11
- PyTorch Day Korea 2026 launches first offline conf, CFP closes Sept 13 — PyTorch · 2026-09-11
- Local LLM server dilemma: 4x CMP-170HX (price up 53% in 20 days) vs Mac Studio M5 Ultra — rumboll · 2026-09-11
- llama.cpp lands Flash Attention tuning for RDNA4, big prefill gains on AMD — pmttyji · 2026-09-11
- Your p99 latency benchmark may be lying: a deep dive into coordinated omission — Franc0Fernand0 · 2026-09-11