David Patterson says AI restrictions should carry legal liability for deaths
davidpattersonx · x · 2026-07-23
David Patterson argues that AI restrictions can cost lives, using cancer research as the example.
- He says blocking systems like Fable from doing cancer research would have real human costs
- He extends the argument to governments and companies that impose AI restrictions, saying they should be held legally liable for deaths they cause
- The post is a direct reply to Elon Musk’s claim that delaying FSD approval in France will cost lives
More from AGI Musings
- As AI Makes Content Creation Virtually Free, Creators Must Prove Their Value — NathanpmYoung · 2026-07-23
- Industry double standards over model distillation are drawing pushback — bindureddy · 2026-07-23
- An AGI-era post says imagination sets the blueprint for what we learn and build — Brian821 · 2026-07-23
- The only way to block distillation is to keep models off user-controlled systems — yacineMTB · 2026-07-23
- LLM text analysis needs human checks, says literary studies discussion — soumitrashukla9 · 2026-07-23
- Margaret Mitchell: Confidence Is Not Competence — mmitchell_ai · 2026-07-23