Mitchell argues open-source companies are needed for security and code quality
mmitchell_ai · x · 2026-07-23
The post argues that an open-source company matters because it can fund full-time security, safeguards, guardrails, and code maintenance.
It pushes back on the idea that open source means “anyone can push code,” and instead distinguishes between open-source software and an open-source company that is responsible for freshness, quality, and security.
More from Companies & People
- Solo Founders Podcast guests post $2B valuations, $20M rounds and $10M ARR — julianweisser · 2026-07-23
- Dimitri Bertsekas, Titan of Optimization and AI, Passes Away at 83 — nordicinst · 2026-07-23
- Cohere partners with HUMAIN to keep building Arabic AI — cohere · 2026-07-23
- Compute is the Spice: Meta Eyes $10B Compute Lease Deal with Anthropic — thealexbanks · 2026-07-23
- Germany logs 3,053 new startups in H1 2026 as AI takes one-third — mgill25 · 2026-07-23
- Women hold only 10–16% of core AI lab roles, says Peter Diamandis — PeterDiamandis · 2026-07-23