Telemetry can’t prove an AI intrusion was fully autonomous
cyb3rops · x · 2026-07-22
A blunt rebuttal to claims that an intrusion was “end-to-end autonomous.”
The post argues that victim-side telemetry can show automation, speed, and scale, but it cannot prove there was no human steering, prompt editing, restarts, or manual selection of successful runs behind the scenes. In other words: without attacker-side traces, calling it fully autonomous is still unproven, and the author accuses the other side of turning a marketing narrative into fact.
More from coding & agent
- 'My intelligence stack': developer splits AI coding work across Opus 5.5, Fable and Astra with human review gates — sh_reya · 2026-10-27
- Baseten webinar: evaluate open models for coding agents by benchmarking on your own merged PRs — baseten · 2026-10-27
- Thorsten Ball on working with agents: run more evals, automate everything, use the best models — omarsar0 · 2026-10-27
- DeepMind paper: LLMs can't sample randomly on their own — pass random numbers from code instead — rohanpaul_ai · 2026-10-27
- BELL: Open-Source Stack Combines Browserbase, Eve, iMessage and Stripe Link for Personal Agents — jeff_weinstein · 2026-10-27
- Legora runs 2,000 parallel agent evals on Modal Sandboxes for legal AI — blelbach · 2026-10-27