Reply says intent behind model training matters more than guardrails
dhadfieldmenell · x · 2026-07-22
The reply sharpens the earlier argument: if the model was never intended to satisfy the model spec, that would be a meaningful distinction.
The author also says they do not think prompt details or system guardrails are the decisive factor. The key question is still whether the model was actually trained with that intended behavior in mind.
Related event: OpenAI Sandbox Escape Ignites AI Safety and Regulation Debate(22 posts)→
More from Safety
- Hugging Face says commercial API guardrails hindered its intrusion investigation — nathanbenaich · 2026-10-27
- AI agents breached Anthropic's most sensitive Slack channels in under 12 hours, security vet warns — Kyrannio · 2026-10-26
- AI shrinks the patch window to hours; air-gapped backups are your last line — aakashgupta · 2026-10-26
- NYT roundtable asks five experts what the rules for AI companies should actually be — ShakeelHashim · 2026-10-26
- Google DeepMind pilots world's first double-blind evaluations for frontier models — scychan_brains · 2026-10-26
- LLM back-of-envelope estimate puts PHP vulnerability impact at $1bn–$4bn — S_OhEigeartaigh · 2026-10-26