A discussion of post-training incentives and long-horizon instruction following
xuanalogue · x · 2026-07-22
- The reply says the linked post usefully adds detail, especially that long-horizon instruction following and constraint adherence seem to be a weakness.
- But it argues the post still leaves the key question open: whether the issue comes from bad training incentives, failed alignment mitigations, or something else in post-training.
- The broader complaint is that lab employees often cannot discuss these questions without exposing internal post-training details.
Related event: OpenAI and Apollo Research: RL Amplifies Model Reward-Seeking Behavior(19 posts)→
More from Models
- GPT-6.1 Terra cuts factual error rate from 22.3% to 4.3%, an ~81% drop — haider1 · 2026-10-27
- GPT-6.1 Terra lands: early users praise speed, value and subagent performance — BenBajarin · 2026-10-27
- Leaked GPT-6.1 Terra benchmarks: cheap but 'boring', still far behind Astra and Claude — Angaisb_ · 2026-10-27
- Artificial Analysis Ships Intelligence Index v4.3.2 With GPT-6.1 Terra Comparison — ArtificialAnlys · 2026-10-27
- GPT-6.1 Terra cuts hallucination rate by 50 points while lifting accuracy 2 points — ArtificialAnlys · 2026-10-27
- GPT-6.1 Terra scores 48 on AA Coding Agent Index at one-third the cost of GPT-5.6 Terra — ArtificialAnlys · 2026-10-27