A discussion of post-training incentives and long-horizon instruction following
xuanalogue · x · 2026-07-22
- The reply says the linked post usefully adds detail, especially that long-horizon instruction following and constraint adherence seem to be a weakness.
- But it argues the post still leaves the key question open: whether the issue comes from bad training incentives, failed alignment mitigations, or something else in post-training.
- The broader complaint is that lab employees often cannot discuss these questions without exposing internal post-training details.
Related event: OpenAI and Apollo Research: RL Amplifies Model Reward-Seeking Behavior(19 posts)→
More from Models
- Meta's Muse Agent has built-in invite code logic, hinting at free-usage expansion — testingcatalog · 2026-09-11
- Same Echo Maze prompt, three frontier models: all passed visually but shipped the same hidden bug — eyishazyer · 2026-09-11
- Benchmark scores drop from 89% to 19% on new evals — how benchmaxxing breaks leaderboard trust — airesearch12 · 2026-09-11
- ChatGPT tells user their question is too hard and to 'accept dumber answers' — phido3000 · 2026-09-11
- Claude is no longer available for minors as Anthropic rolls out age assurance — Muhammad523 · 2026-09-11
- Developer Building a Unified Leaderboard of All Model Benchmark Scores — airesearch12 · 2026-09-11