AI safety assessments should move upstream to training runs
DavidSKrueger · x · 2026-07-22
- A quoted post argues that third-party assessments need to move earlier in the lifecycle, especially to training-run assessments.
- The key claim is that external deployment is no longer the main harm barrier: a sufficiently capable misaligned model could already cause damage during training or internal evaluations.
Related event: AI Safety Researchers Urge Regulation of Internal Deployment and Training(9 posts)→
More from AGI Musings
- US senator slams AI industry for proposing 50-death threshold for 'catastrophic incident' — peterwildeford · 2026-10-27
- Understanding the AI consciousness debate: which theory of mind is behind it — msharmas · 2026-10-27
- Functionalism: if consciousness is just what the brain computes, silicon can run it too — msharmas · 2026-10-27
- iPhone case with 85,000 reviews in days: everything fake in the age of abundance — tekbog · 2026-10-27
- Whether AI can be conscious depends on your definition: five frameworks for thinking about it — msharmas · 2026-10-27
- dunkhippo33 Shares How He Thinks About Raising Kids in the AI Era — kimmonismus · 2026-10-27