Kimi K3 nears the top of AA-Briefcase, but its presentation score trails
ArtificialAnlys · x · 2026-07-22
Artificial Analysis says AA-Briefcase evaluates models on three axes: binary correctness, analytical quality, and presentation quality. Kimi K3 lands near the top overall, but its presentation score lags behind its analytical score.
- Analytical Quality Elo: 1754, roughly in Claude Fable 5 territory (1744).
- Presentation Elo: 1471, below some models it outranks overall, including GPT-5.6 Sol (max) and Claude Opus 4.8 (max).
- The benchmark’s combined Elo blends correctness, analytical quality, and presentation quality into one score.
- A follow-up note says Kimi K3 is second only to Fable 5 on AA-Briefcase, but it costs more than Opus 4.8 to run and averages nearly an hour per task.
Related event: Kimi K3 Scores High on AA-Briefcase but Incurs High Costs and Long Runtimes(5 posts)→
More from Models
- OpenAI benchmark charts become a meme after o1, with GPT-5 and o3 graphics mocked — willdepue · 2026-07-22
- OpenAI o1 beats GPT-4o on AIME, Codeforces, and GPQA Diamond — willdepue · 2026-07-22
- Grok 4.5 is being pitched as a one-person game studio — minchoi · 2026-07-22
- Laguna S 2.1 matches GLM-5.2 on game coding with 6x fewer parameters — rohanpaul_ai · 2026-07-22
- Open source is now challenging the AI duopoly, with Kimi K3 first in line — bindureddy · 2026-07-22
- A January 2025 pretraining cutoff is “mind-boggling” for a small-compute model — _arohan_ · 2026-07-22