Stanford HAI’s PNAS feature maps the legal questions around generative AI
StanfordHAI · x · 2026-07-22
Stanford HAI says its PNAS special feature, “Law in the Age of Generative AI,” examines how law should handle generative AI and how law can help govern the technology.
The feature spans five recurring themes:
- public benchmarking of legal AI systems
- using legal principles to make AI in law more reliable
- how responsibility for safety regulation should be allocated
- bias in existing systems
- viewing law as an adaptive system
The post frames the collection as a broader conversation about the role of AI in law and the role of law in AI governance.
More from Safety
- Safety Risks of Long-Running Models: OpenAI Shares Codex Alignment Insights — burny_tech · 2026-07-22
- AI Regulation Debate: Do Independent Audits Threaten Startups? — ShakeelHashim · 2026-07-22
- EU rules force Google to open Android AI access as Gemini 3.5 Pro slips again — Deep-Owl-1890 · 2026-07-22
- PNAS special issue examines copyright, governance, and AI in the legal system — chrmanning · 2026-07-22
- Pensar Launches AI Security Agent to Autonomously Discover and Patch 0-Days — andriy_mulyar · 2026-07-22
- Bloomberg says Sam Altman will brief Trump officials and Congress on GPT-6 next week — soumitrashukla9 · 2026-07-22