Stanford HAI’s PNAS feature maps the legal questions around generative AI
StanfordHAI · x · 2026-07-22
Stanford HAI says its PNAS special feature, “Law in the Age of Generative AI,” examines how law should handle generative AI and how law can help govern the technology.
The feature spans five recurring themes:
- public benchmarking of legal AI systems
- using legal principles to make AI in law more reliable
- how responsibility for safety regulation should be allocated
- bias in existing systems
- viewing law as an adaptive system
The post frames the collection as a broader conversation about the role of AI in law and the role of law in AI governance.
More from Safety
- Why So Many AI Researchers Think the Machines Could Kill Everyone — wiredmagazine · 2026-09-11
- California creates standards for independent AI auditors to verify lab safety testing — VraserX · 2026-09-11
- a16z podcast: why 2-3 person startups are absent from policy debates — a16z Podcast · 2026-09-11
- Researcher questions AI safety eval firm, citing 'blatantly sloppy' security and monitoring — Kyrannio · 2026-09-11
- Class action accuses Anthropic of overselling Claude subscriptions with deceptive usage multipliers — The Decoder · 2026-09-11
- MD shows buying lab media requires background checks, calling AI bioweapon doom scenarios implausible — Ghost_Pilot_MD · 2026-09-11