Early benchmark results put Kimi K3, GPT-5.6 Sol and Claude Fable 5 at 42/42
bdsqlsz · x · 2026-07-21
Early benchmark results compare several models on the same six-part task set.
- Kimi K3†, GPT-5.6 Sol (xhigh)†, and Claude Fable 5 all score 42/42.
- GPT-5.6 Sol (default) drops to 28/42, Meta Muse Spark 1.1 to 26/42, and xAI Grok 4.5 to 13/42.
- Cost differs sharply: roughly $31 for Kimi K3†, $51 for Claude Fable 5, about $21 for GPT-5.6 Sol (xhigh)†, and only $4 for GPT-5.6 Sol (default).
The post says more results are coming soon, implying this is an early snapshot rather than a final leaderboard.
Related event: Multiple Frontier AI Models Achieve Perfect Scores in IMO 2026 Testing(5 posts)→
More from Models
- Leak claims Gemini 3.5 Pro gets a 2M-token context and better coding — bdsqlsz · 2026-07-21
- Ethan Mollick says AI-writing sameness is about craft, not em dashes or bullet lists — emollick · 2026-07-21
- Kimi rolls out paid plan upgrades with tiers from $19 to $199 a month — gnukeith · 2026-07-21
- Open-source labs could distill a state-of-the-art model to 32GB or 80GB VRAM, the post argues — bookwormengr · 2026-07-21
- Moonshot pauses Kimi K3 signups five days after launch as GPU demand surges — eyishazyer · 2026-07-21
- AI Diplomacy demo makes agents negotiate, ally, and betray each other — jamdac · 2026-07-21