Aidan Clark says both company insiders and open-source diehards are showing bias
_aidan_clark_ · x · 2026-07-21
Aidan Clark pushes back on criticism that Dean is just acting like a company insider, arguing that open-source diehards also show clear bias when they refuse to admit this is not just another software debate.
It is a direct reply in the same thread about GPT-OSS, adding that the disagreement is not only about openness but about deeper assumptions and incentives in the AI industry.
Related event: GPT-OSS Open-Source Debate: Risk Assessment vs. Regulation(22 posts)→
More from Safety
- Why So Many AI Researchers Think the Machines Could Kill Everyone — wiredmagazine · 2026-09-11
- California creates standards for independent AI auditors to verify lab safety testing — VraserX · 2026-09-11
- a16z podcast: why 2-3 person startups are absent from policy debates — a16z Podcast · 2026-09-11
- Researcher questions AI safety eval firm, citing 'blatantly sloppy' security and monitoring — Kyrannio · 2026-09-11
- Class action accuses Anthropic of overselling Claude subscriptions with deceptive usage multipliers — The Decoder · 2026-09-11
- MD shows buying lab media requires background checks, calling AI bioweapon doom scenarios implausible — Ghost_Pilot_MD · 2026-09-11