Vitalik: compare AI and humans across many capabilities, not one metric
anselm · x · 2026-07-20
Vitalik argues that human-vs-AI comparisons should not be reduced to a single axis such as intelligence or aggregate economic performance.
He proposes a multi-capability framework: humans and machines each have a broad set of physical and mental abilities. Historically, machines have only clearly outperformed us in a small number of areas—early examples include watermills and windmills. The accompanying chart illustrates this idea by showing machines dominating only a few capability types while humans remain stronger across most others.
The point of the thread is that as AI capabilities keep growing, the right question is not “Is AI smarter than humans?” but which capabilities are being surpassed, and what does that mean for society?
More from AGI Musings
- Claude Code skill uses 10 Markdown rules to make outputs ADHD-friendly — alex_verem · 2026-07-22
- AI Power Demand Exposes US Energy Gap, Urging Shift from Scarcity to Abundance — bradneuberg · 2026-07-22
- ControlAI CEO says an international ban on superintelligence is needed to avert extinction risk — zetalyrae · 2026-07-22
- Gary Marcus says LLMs still cannot really do math on their own — GaryMarcus · 2026-07-22
- Gary Marcus says LLM math skills are like knowing only a car’s engine size — GaryMarcus · 2026-07-22
- AI may make digital work infinitely leveraged while offline life gets more human — illscience · 2026-07-22