LLMs Need More RL Training for Vulnerability Mining
teortaxesTex · x · 2026-07-20
Discussions point out that randomly sampled CVE (security vulnerability) tests have become too easy for current models to differentiate their capabilities, prompting the community to build more challenging, curated datasets.
Commenter teortaxesTex noted that models like GLM 5.2 and Kimi K3 are currently far from their capability ceilings due to insufficient reinforcement learning (RL) training. In comparison, models like GPT, Grok, and Opus perform more stably because of more comprehensive RL. Domestic models still need to increase their training steps to improve consistency.
More from Models
- GPT-6 Astra beats Factorio with enemies in 44 in-game hours at ~$4,500 API cost — liminal_bardo · 2026-09-11
- awesome-llm-leaderboards: an open-source directory of LLM leaderboards, pricing tables, comparison tools — Last_Establishment_1 · 2026-09-11
- Anthropic claims it works to keep eval environments unidentifiable to models — MaxKannen · 2026-09-11
- Nex N2.5 Pro released on Hugging Face with 407GB of weights — jinnyjuice · 2026-09-11
- RoMa v2 image matching model unveiled in the usual black poster — ducha_aiki · 2026-09-11
- OpenAI rated Astra 'Critical' for cyber capabilities — and admits it's harder to monitor — theguywhobuilds · 2026-09-11