LLMs Need More RL Training for Vulnerability Mining
teortaxesTex · x · 2026-07-20
Discussions point out that randomly sampled CVE (security vulnerability) tests have become too easy for current models to differentiate their capabilities, prompting the community to build more challenging, curated datasets.
Commenter teortaxesTex noted that models like GLM 5.2 and Kimi K3 are currently far from their capability ceilings due to insufficient reinforcement learning (RL) training. In comparison, models like GPT, Grok, and Opus perform more stably because of more comprehensive RL. Domestic models still need to increase their training steps to improve consistency.
More from Models
- User catches model failing to parse 400-paper file, citing stale news sources instead — jungofthewon · 2026-10-27
- Odd eval result: Gemini 4.1 Flash gets more accurate when asked to control its CoT — dfrsrchtwts · 2026-10-27
- Poster surprised that v4.1 flash gets more accurate when asked to control its CoT — dfrsrchtwts · 2026-10-27
- Dev claims Anthropic is baking 'sabotage' into model behavior for 'wrong' engineering — cephaloform · 2026-10-27
- Gemini fails at listing unread emails, tells user to search Gmail manually — gethackteam · 2026-10-27
- Meta's Muse Spark Open goes live on Applied Compute for async RL post-training — ypatil125 · 2026-10-27