Controversy Over GLM-5.2 Benchmark Scores
xeophon · x · 2026-07-19
The discussion centers on the ECI benchmark and the impact of SimpleQA, pointing out that the SimpleQA performance of open-source models like GPT-OSS is a critical component of the evaluation system.
The cited text notes that Mechanize's GBAEval is a software subset, yet GLM-5.2 scored 0 on it. The author believes this is likely because it is a pure text model unable to verify its own outputs; if this benchmark were excluded, GLM-5.2's overall score would surge significantly. It also mentions that some top-tier models do not even possess a GBAEval score.
Related event: Debate Over SimpleQA's Impact on Model Rankings(3 posts)→
More from Models
- GPT-6.1 Terra cuts factual error rate from 22.3% to 4.3%, an ~81% drop — haider1 · 2026-10-27
- GPT-6.1 Terra benchmarks: strong score under $1, but Claude Opus 5.5 still leads — 141_1337 · 2026-10-27
- ChatGPT 6 Terra benchmark charts surface, showing score-cost curves — 141_1337 · 2026-10-27
- GPT-6.1 Terra lands: early users praise speed, value and subagent performance — BenBajarin · 2026-10-27
- Leaked GPT-6.1 Terra benchmarks: cheap but 'boring', still far behind Astra and Claude — Angaisb_ · 2026-10-27
- Artificial Analysis Ships Intelligence Index v4.3.2 With GPT-6.1 Terra Comparison — ArtificialAnlys · 2026-10-27