Controversy Over GLM-5.2 Benchmark Scores
xeophon · x · 2026-07-19
The discussion centers on the **ECI benchmark** and the **impact of SimpleQA**, pointing out that the SimpleQA performance of open-source models like GPT-OSS is a critical component of the evaluation system. The cited text notes that Mechanize's **GBAEval** is a software subset, yet **GLM-5.2 scored 0** on it. The author believes this is likely because it is a **pure text model** unable to verify its own outputs; if this benchmark were excluded, **GLM-5.2's overall score would surge significantly**. It also mentions that some top-tier models do not even possess a GBAEval score.
Related event: Debate Over SimpleQA's Impact on Model Rankings(3 posts)→
More from Models
- Kimi K3 hits 89.4% peak on software tasks while Fable 5 is slightly steadier — FinanceYF5 · 2026-07-21
- Kimi K3 leads on Go, but Fable 5 wins Python, JavaScript, TypeScript and Rust — FinanceYF5 · 2026-07-21
- Kimi K3 reaches 89.4% pass@4 and tops the benchmark over GPT-5.6 Sol — FinanceYF5 · 2026-07-21
- Kimi K3 and Fable 5 now look much closer than the old open-vs-closed gap — FinanceYF5 · 2026-07-21
- A viral post claims Claude can build a full mobile app in minutes — hey_abusiddik · 2026-07-21
- Qwen3.8 Max Preview is reportedly thinking for 10 to 30 minutes — vista8 · 2026-07-21