Why ML Peer Reviews Always Need Chasing
thegautamkamath · x · 2026-07-19
The author recalls taking reviewing very seriously during their early PhD years, noting that in theoretical computer science, one could generally expect senior researchers to provide detailed feedback.
However, in the machine learning field, reviewing often feels like "forced homework." Without constant follow-ups and reminders, many reviewers simply fail to complete their reviews on schedule.
Related event: Researchers Express Frustration Over ML Peer Review Ecosystem(2 posts)→
More from Research
- Datology webinar: Curation Studio matched top data baselines with under 20% compute — josh_wills · 2026-10-27
- KANLab: an interactive browser playground for Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks — Lukas Niehaus · 2026-10-27
- CMU's LLM2Cert synthesizes stability certificates verified via SMT and Lean — CarnegieMellonU · 2026-10-27
- NVIDIA open-sources FLORA, a robotics data engine ~125x cheaper than GPT-6 Astra — nvidia · 2026-10-27
- RSNA 2026 Deep Learning Labs return: eight hands-on AI classes over four days in Chicago — PRouzrokh · 2026-10-27
- Steering two orthogonal concept neurons makes a model compose "gnome" — Sauers_ · 2026-10-27