Why ML Peer Reviews Always Need Chasing
thegautamkamath · x · 2026-07-19
The author recalls taking reviewing very seriously during their early PhD years, noting that in theoretical computer science, one could generally expect senior researchers to provide detailed feedback.
However, in the machine learning field, reviewing often feels like "forced homework." Without constant follow-ups and reminders, many reviewers simply fail to complete their reviews on schedule.
Related event: Researchers Express Frustration Over ML Peer Review Ecosystem(2 posts)→
More from Research
- OpenAI says long-horizon models need safety and alignment checks across full action sequences — rhiever · 2026-07-22
- A Reddit user proposes a consistency LoRA to keep anime and game scenes visually stable — ThirdWorldBoy21 · 2026-07-22
- Graph workload 854.graph500 enters SPEC CPU 2026 as a new CPU benchmark — Prof_DavidBader · 2026-07-22
- BlackboxNLP 2026 is recruiting extra reviewers after a high submission volume — hanjie_chen · 2026-07-22
- AWS shows self-distilled reasoning can preserve math and coding skills during SFT — AWS ML Blog · 2026-07-22
- UI2App shows screenshot fidelity still lags real interaction recovery — Grace Man Chen · 2026-07-22