W&B Tested: Agent Prompt Injection Defense Tools Compared
wandb · x · 2026-07-16
W&B conducted an AI security test by feeding the same malicious email into two different AI agents. One agent directly leaked the client's SSN and credit card number, while the other successfully intercepted the prompt injection before the model read it, redacted the sensitive data, and still generated a usable response. The test demonstrates that this security gap primarily depends on the protective tools employed by the agent.
More from coding & agent
- Cognition's SWE-2 uses a KKT duality argument in RL to shift the effort Pareto curve — YouJiacheng · 2026-09-11
- First-ever Three.js Conference lands in Paris, with a panel on AI-shortened design workflows — OdinLovis · 2026-09-11
- Data engineering, not agent frameworks, is the real bottleneck for enterprise AI agents — dhruv2038 · 2026-09-11
- RTK Terminal Compression Cuts Tokens but Leaves Your AI Coding Bill Unchanged — Bartaseth · 2026-09-11
- GPT-6 Astra beats Factorio with enemies in 44 in-game hours at ~$4,500 API cost — liminal_bardo · 2026-09-11
- Investment Analyst Asks How to Build a Claude-Based Diligence Agent Stack — Careless_Tie2286 · 2026-09-11