Questioning the Evidence Strength of AI Policy Papers
joshua_saxe · x · 2026-07-16
This comment argues that a paper discussing AI-related social feedback and impacts is "interesting but shouldn't be used directly as a policy basis."
Core points:
- The paper leans more towards philosophical and theoretical deduction rather than solid data science evidence.
- With this level of evidence, it's fine for discussion and proposing hypotheses, but insufficient to support policymaking.
- Because the scenarios are too speculative, it's difficult to reliably analyze how the socio-technical feedback mentioned in the paper would actually occur.
More from AGI Musings
- Gary Marcus says LLMs still cannot really do math on their own — GaryMarcus · 2026-07-22
- Gary Marcus says LLM math skills are like knowing only a car’s engine size — GaryMarcus · 2026-07-22
- AI may make digital work infinitely leveraged while offline life gets more human — illscience · 2026-07-22
- Better AI math could save researchers time by killing false conjectures earlier — prateekj · 2026-07-22
- AI’s economic forecasts are split by nearly a quadrillion dollars by 2035 — bittingthembits · 2026-07-22
- Open source is becoming tech’s soft power, says Kevin Xu — kevinsxu · 2026-07-22