You Could Have Trained Kimi K1.5
henloitsjoyce · x · 2026-07-15
The article "You could've trained the Kimi K1.5" discusses why models like Kimi K1.5 "perhaps could have been trained," prompting reflections on training pathways.
The sharing text mentions the author recently recalled John Schulman's view: many breakthroughs are fundamentally less complex than imagined. Combined with the title, the article uses Kimi K1.5 to discuss simplicity, reproducibility in model training, and a redefined understanding of "breakthroughs."
More from Models
- Rumor claims Kimi faked performance by serving Claude; DeepSeek new model surprises in evals — realsohamparekh · 2026-09-11
- GPT-5.6 writes well but is instantly forgettable, user complains — BasedRaddka · 2026-09-11
- Opus Refuses Protein Research Codebase Over 'Safety' Concerns, Dev Considers Rolling His Own — josephdviviano · 2026-09-11
- User Hails Unconfirmed 'DeepSeek 4.1 Flash' as an Inflection Point in LLMs — himanshustwts · 2026-09-11
- Terminal Bench v4: GLM-5.3 Leads at 41.9%, Kimi-K3 Underwhelms at 12.6% — Ok_Warning2146 · 2026-09-11
- GPT-6 Astra beats Factorio with enemies in 44 in-game hours at ~$4,500 API cost — liminal_bardo · 2026-09-11