Analyzing the LLM Slop Trend in Submissions
NeelNanda5 · x · 2026-07-15
The author mentions having organized 3 mech interp workshops, inadvertently accumulating a dataset of submissions perfect for analyzing the upward trend of "LLM slop".
@andyarditi's analysis focuses on:
- The actual volume of AI slop accepted
- How this situation has evolved since 2024
- Whether the review process is genuinely "all noise"
The author emphasizes that this is a post-hoc analysis and that Pangram was not used when making their decisions.
Related event: Data Confirms Worsening LLM Slop in Academic Submissions(2 posts)→
More from Research
- Structural ensembles beat single predictions in TCR:pMHC generalization study — quaidmorris · 2026-07-22
- Structural ensembles, not single predictions, drive robust TCR:pMHC generalization — quaidmorris · 2026-07-22
- enFoldX turns AlphaFold3 ensemble noise into a TCR–peptide–MHC predictor — quaidmorris · 2026-07-22
- RSS launches under OMSF to push structural biology data modeling at scale — MoAlQuraishi · 2026-07-22
- enFoldX tops 8 neoantigen scans and an unseen-peptide benchmark — quaidmorris · 2026-07-22
- enFoldX reaches AUC 0.82 on human VDJdb and transfers to mouse at 0.76 — quaidmorris · 2026-07-22