Making Codex Multi-Agent Scheduling More Practical
seatedro · x · 2026-07-15
This post discusses the actual costs of using Codex and the effectiveness of multi-agent workflows.
Key takeaways:
- The author thanks the OpenAI team for helping resolve Codex usage quota issues
- They are already on their 4th account, highlighting rapid consumption
- They note that multiagent-v2 isn't very practical and quickly burns through credits
- A better approach is using a single coordinator to dispatch 3 specialized agents, rather than overcomplicating the system
Related event: Developers Share Token-Saving Strategies for Cloud AI Coding(4 posts)→
More from coding & agent
- Coding agents are heading toward an AI-writes, AI-reviews, human-approves workflow — aftahi_ai · 2026-07-22
- oMLX 0.5.2 adds Mac menu-bar stats, low-bit decode kernels, and faster downloads — awnihannun · 2026-07-22
- GitHub review bot hits its PR limit and forces a 39-minute cooldown — DanielLockyer · 2026-07-22
- Max reasoning effort appears to be mobile-only in Codex Remote, not desktop — GabGarrett · 2026-07-22
- A Reddit demo argues online stores should expose carts and pricing through MCP — gelembjuk · 2026-07-22
- Open-source AI SDK provider routes Vercel apps through a local Codex subscription — lgrammel · 2026-07-22