Meta's Model Tops Medical Evaluation
Scobleizer · x · 2026-07-14
The core shared update is that Meta's Muse Spark 1.1 performed exceptionally well on the HealthBench Professional medical evaluation. The author claims it achieved a better overall score across 525 real-world clinical tasks and essentially matched GPT-5.6 Sol after length adjustment.
Another key highlight is cost: the model's input/output pricing is listed at $1.25/$4.25 per M tokens, compared to $5/$30 per M tokens for the baseline model, making the output side roughly 7x cheaper. The original poster interprets this as a clear "comeback" for Meta in the AI race.
More from Models
- AI Sextet offers 6 models free and unlimited for 14 days, including DeepSeek and Qwen — airesearch12 · 2026-09-11
- BullshitBench update: GPT-6-Astra beats all prior OpenAI models but still trails Anthropic — scaling01 · 2026-09-11
- Astra Scores 83% on GauntletBench, First Computer-Use Agent to Beat Human Baseline — ducha_aiki · 2026-09-11
- Kimi K2.8 Preview rolls out: near-K3 coding performance, 1M context for all tiers — teortaxesTex · 2026-09-11
- Looking for a classifier of software engineering task shapes to pick models per task — StewartalsopIII · 2026-09-11
- DeepSeek V4 Pro API to continue after Sept 2026, billing unchanged — teortaxesTex · 2026-09-11