Who Defines What Makes AI 'Better' for Humans?
Training-Contract789 · reddit · 2026-07-14
The core of this post isn't about "what AI can do," but rather **谁来定义 AI 让人变得更好**. The author argues that if AI enters everyone's critical decision-making scenarios, it could make people calmer, healthier, and more rational, potentially reducing conflict and bringing greater prosperity; however, the real key question is: **控制这些“价值函数”的人,最终会不会塑造文明本身**. The post further asks: - Today's "better" might mean happier and healthier; - But centuries from now, this goal could be entirely different; - So, who exactly is supervising the "intelligence that supervises everyone"?
Related event: Opinion: The Core Value of AI is to Help Us Become Better Humans(2 posts)→
More from AGI Musings
- Distillation alone is unlikely to explain the rise of Chinese AI models, says Reddit post — pier4r · 2026-07-21
- New papers say scaffolds explain only 1.5% of agent performance variance — gerardsans · 2026-07-21
- Larry Fink says China is ahead in the AI energy race, citing 100 GW nuclear buildout — rohanpaul_ai · 2026-07-21
- Jamie Dimon says bureaucracy, not AI, is the real system crushing intelligence — r0ck3t23 · 2026-07-21
- OpenAI and Anthropic’s internal models are said to be far stronger than today’s public systems — scaling01 · 2026-07-21
- Superintelligence and robot abundance will force a new social contract — Dr_Singularity · 2026-07-21