Hands-On Feedback on Coding Sub-Agents
davidmanheim · x · 2026-07-13
This reply offers brief hands-on feedback on a coding agent/sub-agent system: it correctly adds tests during its workflow, and the sub-agent functionality looks solid.
However, the author notes that it broke the workflow on a small, untested step. It was easy to fix, but its overall capability is still "far inferior to Claude."
Related event: David Manheim Reports Instability in OpenAI Codex CLI Agent Monitoring(5 posts)→
More from coding & agent
- Building a Secure AI Agent Gateway: Self-Hosting OAuth for Multiple SaaS Apps — Defiant_Cod_2654 · 2026-07-22
- Rowboat launches as an open-source, local-first AI coworker with memory — ycombinator · 2026-07-22
- Reddit user chains Ideogram 4 and Krea2 to mimic bbox-based image positioning — v3lh0t05c0 · 2026-07-22
- Apollo Cuts AI Assistant Skill Dev Time by 85% with Deep Agents — LangChain · 2026-07-22
- Scoble says AI “loops” really means long-running multi-agent workspaces — Scobleizer · 2026-07-22
- Kimi Code opens a waitlist as Moonshot rolls out its coding product — Fabulous_Bonus_8981 · 2026-07-22