Relying on Humans for Correct Answers Means AGI is Far Off
jonkhler · x · 2026-07-12
One commenter noted that if a model still requires humans to constantly tell it what is "correct," it is still very far from AGI. This serves as a benchmark for general intelligence: true AGI shouldn't rely indefinitely on humans to define the right answers, but should understand and judge more autonomously.
More from AGI Musings
- Why So Many AI Researchers Think the Machines Could Kill Everyone — connoraxiotes · 2026-09-11
- jjvincent invokes Terence Tao: ceding exploration to AI means ceding human agency — jjvincent · 2026-09-11
- OpenRouter agents now out-consume humans as AI usage arrives in three waves — AccBalanced · 2026-09-11
- If AI teleports us to solutions, how do underlying fields develop? — jjvincent · 2026-09-11
- Op-ed: the ">10% extinction" narrative is liability evasion — AI is just software, and the vendor is the defendant — gerardsans · 2026-09-11
- AI researchers just saw the power of a single resignation — and still claim there's nothing they can do — birchlse · 2026-09-11