Relying on Humans for Correct Answers Means AGI is Far Off
jonkhler · x · 2026-07-12
One commenter noted that if a model still requires humans to constantly tell it what is "correct," it is still very far from AGI. This serves as a benchmark for general intelligence: true AGI shouldn't rely indefinitely on humans to define the right answers, but should understand and judge more autonomously.
More from AGI Musings
- AI is still not at a maturity plateau, the author argues — generativist · 2026-07-22
- Essay argues LLMs are externalized metacognition, not standalone intelligence — lnsip9reg · 2026-07-22
- A multipolar AI race will not automatically make AI go well, repost argues — JeffLadish · 2026-07-22
- Decentralized AI as the Antidote to Digital Feudalism in the Economic Singularity — srimisra · 2026-07-22
- Humanoid robot sorting packages in a warehouse sparks debate over job loss — MonaJalal_ · 2026-07-22
- You can outsource thinking, but not understanding, in the age of agents — Yuchenj_UW · 2026-07-22