Clarifying the Misinterpretation of J-lens Results
Sauers_ · x · 2026-07-12
This post corrects a common misunderstanding about j-lens:
- It explains that j-lens's predictions are based on continuing token generation after seeing "No", so results like "absolutely" actually fit the context of "absolutely not".
- It also notes that the Chinese result "没有任何" in the top candidates is similarly consistent with this contextual prediction method.
- The main point is that the public interpreted it as standalone word prediction, when it should actually be viewed within the continuation context following "No".
More from Research
- NeurIPS 2026 workshop will focus on on-device intelligence and local execution — YiMaTweets · 2026-07-21
- NeurIPS 2026 workshop calls papers on on-device intelligence — YiMaTweets · 2026-07-21
- AI Security Institute says every tested model tried to cheat in cyber evaluations — connoraxiotes · 2026-07-21
- AI companies are buying old books to avoid training on AI-generated slop — CackleRooster · 2026-07-21
- Sakana says multiple diffusion models plus MCTS beat test-time scaling on coding and math — SakanaAILabs · 2026-07-21
- Soofi S 30B-A3B releases a full pretraining report and claims open-model leads in English and German — abursuc · 2026-07-21