Update: Fable Offers More Complete Data
deedydas · x · 2026-07-11
The author added a few conclusions from the test:
- Sol took about 8.5 分钟 on the first attempt, only creating a stock demo; a subsequent 8 分钟 run still required an API key to fetch real data.
- Fable managed to find a way to retrieve real data on its own, offering a more complete experience.
- Feature-wise, Fable provides richer filters (gains/losses, log scale, more categories, countries, Top X), while Sol leans towards sectors, minimum returns, client search, and bookmarks.
- The author prefers Fable's UI, though both are generally solid.
- Regarding data granularity, Fable offers more detailed stock data, whereas Sol uses fewer data points and smoother curves, which didn't fully meet the author's desired outcome.
Related event: GPT-5.6 Sol vs Fable 5: The Trade-off Between Intelligence and Utility(18 posts)→
More from Models
- 6TB of Fable data sold with leaked SSH keys, cloud creds tied to Xiaomi, Huawei, NIO — teortaxesTex · 2026-09-11
- AI Sextet offers 6 models free and unlimited for 14 days, including DeepSeek and Qwen — airesearch12 · 2026-09-11
- BullshitBench update: GPT-6-Astra beats all prior OpenAI models but still trails Anthropic — scaling01 · 2026-09-11
- Astra Scores 83% on GauntletBench, First Computer-Use Agent to Beat Human Baseline — ducha_aiki · 2026-09-11
- Kimi K2.8 Preview rolls out: near-K3 coding performance, 1M context for all tiers — teortaxesTex · 2026-09-11
- Looking for a classifier of software engineering task shapes to pick models per task — StewartalsopIII · 2026-09-11