Questioning the Doomsday Extrapolation of AI 2040
joshua_saxe · x · 2026-07-11
The author questions the pessimistic narrative of "AI 2040"-style predictions, arguing that the reasoning used to support a rapid march toward doomsday is inadequate.
He presents a few counterexamples:
- In reality, radiologists and programmers are still employed, and automated coffee machines haven't replaced baristas.
- If coding agents had already achieved significant autonomy at big tech companies, we should be seeing widespread small-scale scheming, reward hacking, or misalignment harm by now.
Therefore, he believes the authors haven't adequately explained these empirical facts. Their conclusions should be more cautious rather than pushing resources, initiatives, and governance based on an overly extreme conceptual model.
Related event: AI 2027 Team Releases AI 2040 Future Scenario Projections(40 posts)→
More from AGI Musings
- The Evolution of LLM Business Models: Selling Outcomes Over Tokens — yacineMTB · 2026-07-22
- Bindu Reddy says GPT-6 is coming soon, with Alibaba, DeepSeek and Kimi close behind — bindureddy · 2026-07-22
- Bindu Reddy says the industry still lacks a way to train 20T models and scale post-training RL — bindureddy · 2026-07-22
- Advanced AI Models Are Becoming Impossible to Plug and Play — emollick · 2026-07-22
- AI suggested a better composition, and that made one user uneasy — Sydde · 2026-07-22
- The Thimble and the Waterfall: AI's Data Bottleneck and Feedback Loops — dyamins · 2026-07-22