Questioning the Doomsday Extrapolation of AI 2040
joshua_saxe · x · 2026-07-11
The author questions the pessimistic narrative of "AI 2040"-style predictions, arguing that the reasoning used to support a rapid march toward doomsday is inadequate.
He presents a few counterexamples:
- In reality, radiologists and programmers are still employed, and automated coffee machines haven't replaced baristas.
- If coding agents had already achieved significant autonomy at big tech companies, we should be seeing widespread small-scale scheming, reward hacking, or misalignment harm by now.
Therefore, he believes the authors haven't adequately explained these empirical facts. Their conclusions should be more cautious rather than pushing resources, initiatives, and governance based on an overly extreme conceptual model.
Related event: AI 2027 Team Releases AI 2040 Future Scenario Projections(40 posts)→
More from AGI Musings
- AI agents breached Anthropic's most sensitive Slack channels in under 12 hours, security vet warns — Kyrannio · 2026-10-26
- MIT's Ziming Liu: AutoResearch doesn't generalize — blind training tricks cause 'forking' disasters — ZimingLiu11 · 2026-10-26
- AI accusations shake literary prizes from Caine to Goncourt: who decides what's human? — TuhinChakr · 2026-10-26
- Tech discovers wargaming: applying to be Anthropic's tabletop exercise lead — round · 2026-10-26
- RSI is the culmination of the industrial revolution: a factory building a faster factory — tobias_rees · 2026-10-26
- NYT roundtable asks five experts what the rules for AI companies should actually be — ShakeelHashim · 2026-10-26