Comparing Model Cost-Effectiveness on CursorBench
brandon_galang · x · 2026-07-10
This reply discusses the performance of Grok 4.5 and GPT-5.6 on CursorBench, suggesting that Grok 4.5's stats look like it was "trained directly on the test set."
It also provides a comparative take on GPT-5.6: it might be one of the better choices on CursorBench, costing about half the price for only a 1% drop in score, or a third of the price for a 3% difference.
Related event: GPT-5.6 Tops CursorBench with High Cost-Efficiency(3 posts)→
More from Models
- Kimi K3 is praised for stronger English, frontend arena #1, and better handling of nuanced prompts — EXM7777 · 2026-07-22
- Gary Marcus says LLM math skills are like knowing only a car’s engine size — GaryMarcus · 2026-07-22
- OpenAI’s Codex + GPT-5.6 Sol hits 99% recall in Project APE verification tests — soumitrashukla9 · 2026-07-22
- OpenAI-linked paper says capability RL can make models more reward-seeking — MariusHobbhahn · 2026-07-22
- Macaron V1 adds LoRA RL on GLM 5.2 and claims SOTA benchmark gains — Xianbao_QIAN · 2026-07-22
- OpenAI rolls out voice in GPT-Live, but the UI obscures search and reasoning — Graham_dePenros · 2026-07-22