Grok 4.5 Proven Faster in Coding Tasks
heypearlai · x · 2026-07-09
A post reveals that in the same coding task test, Grok 4.5 completed the entire job in 56 seconds, consumed 58K context tokens, and produced valid results. In contrast, Fable took 10 minutes and consumed 93K tokens to achieve a valid outcome. Based on this, the author considers Grok 4.5 to be exceptionally fast and emphasizes the need to evaluate models based on "cost per task" rather than just comparing raw token costs.
Related event: Grok 4.5 Outperforms Fable in Coding Speed and Efficiency(3 posts)→
More from coding & agent
- Building a Secure AI Agent Gateway: Self-Hosting OAuth for Multiple SaaS Apps — Defiant_Cod_2654 · 2026-07-22
- Rowboat launches as an open-source, local-first AI coworker with memory — ycombinator · 2026-07-22
- Scoble says AI “loops” really means long-running multi-agent workspaces — Scobleizer · 2026-07-22
- Kimi Code opens a waitlist as Moonshot rolls out its coding product — Fabulous_Bonus_8981 · 2026-07-22
- Open-source runtime lets each repo define its own AI code reviewer — ibabufrik · 2026-07-22
- Indie Dev Asks: What's Actually Broken in Your AI Agent's Memory Today? — AcceptableTime7937 · 2026-07-22